Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Rethinking kitsch

Does anybody remember these? 

Did it jibe with your psychedelic wallpaper while rockin' you out on Elton John or Three Dog Night in the summer of '72? 

Did it mingle with your macramé when you wore it on your wrist like a bracelet or strung it around your neck like love-beads? 

Did you twist it while doin' the Twist in your bellbottoms or miniskirt?

Did its sweetcake commercials turn you on soooooooo much it made the top of your list of must-haves?

If you answered 'no' to any of the above—'cause either you weren't around back then or this kind of kitsch was just not that into you—these are examples of the Toot-a-Loop Crazy Color Radio, aka Panasonic R-72. People found it groovy, not so much for its sound (which was far from hi-fi, and was AM only), but for its portability, wearability, and twistability 
("It's an S, it's an O, it's a crazy ra-di-o!" went its Mary Poppinsy jingle—though you had to twist it open to adjust the dial). Others dug its donut-hole familiarity, sensuous curves, and novel look and feel compared to the "square" transistor radios with the telescopic antennae they were getting bored of listening to on the beach.

Yeah, I had an orange-yellow Toot-a-Loop. And I slathered it with the psychedelic stickers that came with it, to mesh with my "mod room." But its novelty wore off quickly as I tired of its tinny reception and aimed for a higher-fi sound.



Western Electric got in on the act with its Sculptura Round Donut Phone, in both touch-tone and rotary dial (who remembers how to work one of those?) versions. Now the skinnier part of the negative space in-between the non-concentric circles became the receiver, while the heavier half held the cradle, buttons or dial, and wiring. But this was as temporal as the Toot-a-Loop, especially when digital development turned them both into dinosaur doodads I dismissed for years as void of intellectual or archival value.



It turned out I was duped. An odyssey through Boston's Museum of Science revealed to me the mathematical origins of these gimmicks: the Dupin Cyclide. Initially recalling the familiar Toot-a-Loop image of my preteens, this display presented itself as a geometric solid curving out of two nonconcentric circles as a tubular sequence of circles expanding to halfway around and contracting back to the initial starting size to form a symmetrical solid of a circle-within-a-circle, bulging at one end and thinning back out at the other. 

A complex model, to be sure, but basically this model I saw at the museum can fit 14 spheres inside it so that each sphere would touch its neighbor and all spheres would touch the cyclide's circular surface. In the computer-generated model to the right, the cyclide comprises multiple circles going both latitudinally and longitudinally, such that the latitudinal circles diminish in distance from each other as they near the thinner side of the cyclide but the longitudinal circles are always equidistant from each other. The cladding of the web the circles create forms a dupin cyclide solid.


Phoenix Center's internal office building, taken in
2011 while under construction. Photo by Hat600.
And yes, the dupin cyclide model figures prominently in organic modern architecture. Perhaps the most remarkable example is the Phoenix International Media Center in Beijing, China, which applies the Dupin Cyclide form of bulging out at one end and thinning back out at the other to 
form a mathematically harmonic relationship with its alignment with the bending road beside it, its immediate street corner, and Chaoyang Park on one side of it.

According to its architect, Shao Weiping, the Phoenix Center's web network of mathematical spheres creates a twisting lattice "mesh" of a DNA-like double helix, wrapped in a loop in circular contours that serve as a living example of the yin-yang symbol of ancient Chinese philosophy, with two opposing geometric forces counter-forcing against each other yet complementing each other in a tension of harmony and a pushmi-pullyu of balance.

Entrance to Phoenix Center, Beijing, China. Photo by EditQ.
Designed with parametric 3D 
modelling software, including the late Frank Gehry's Digital Project modeling tools, the Phoenix Center's dupin cyclide curves and contours have a scentifically practical use as well: they were manipulated to channel the building's surrounding airflow and convert the steel diagrid into a network of miniature canals that rechannel rainwater into reflective pools around the Center.

So, before you dismiss '70s and other fads as passé kitsch, do the math and consider the intellectual origins behind it.

Thank you for visiting. I welcome your comments!


Sources:

"Dupin cyclide," Wikipedia, last edited on 16 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dupin_cyclide

Giovannini, Joseph, "Phoenix International Media Center, Designed by BIAD," Architect, July 14, 2014, https://www.architectmagazine.com/design/buildings/phoenix-international-media-center-designed-by-biad_o/

"Phoenix Center," Wikipedia,  last edited on 7 May 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Center

Motel majesty

"Main Street is almost all right."   — Robert Venturi
Photo by Jerry Huddleston.
I've always loved motels. They were what I looked forward to most of all on family car trips (aside from for root-beer-and-burger chow-downs at A&W). 

Yeah, I know. Cheap. Cheesy. Chintzy. Gaudy. Junky. Tacky. Trashy. Ugly. Baaaaad. Boring. Drab. Dull. Fake. Lowbrow. No class. No taste. No vacancy. Urban blight. Suburban sprawl. If you've seen one, you've seen 'em all. Good for Joe Bag-o'-Donuts. Or Joe Six-pack. Or Johnny Smoke. Or a one-night stand. Or the Gideons. Or a towel to swipe from the bathroom.

So what merit can an architecture aficionado like me possibly see in a motel? I'll tell you. Class. Clean. Comfy-cozy. Convenient. Cushy. Cool (as long as the AC is on, the curtains are drawn and the blinds are down). And this seemingly sleepy Super 8 Motel down the road from me in Watertown, Massachusetts (below), is no exception. If I stayed here, I'd be...

HOME!

 
That's my gut reaction the moment I step into a motel room. No frills. No window-dressing. Just the basics. Beds. Lamps. Nightstand. Radiator. AC. TV. Wi-Fi. Window. Curtains. Cabinet. Carpet. Chairs. Table. Drawer (where Gideons' Bible pops out at you, whether you like it or not). Shower. Shampoo. Sink. Soap. Towels. Toilet. What more do you really need to live well?

That's what I love about motels — all the comforts of home with the clean lines of economy — the basic values we all long for in our living space (and where we'd stay forever, if we could afford it). But it's pointless to poeticize other Boston-area motels, for, as noted above, they're just like all the rest. So, to get some architectural ooh-aah in here, let's motor across America and see some motels made with more imagination...

Tom's territory

The Tom Sawyer Motor Inn was one of the first motels I ever stayed in as a kid — and where I first learned about Mark Twain's mischievous but memorable literary character. This one in Elmira, N.Y. (now the Mark Twain Motor Inn), stretches long across its lot, expressing its namesake's adventurous, freebooting wanderlust.

Star Lite stretch

Photo by White Writer.
The Star Lite Motel in Dilworth, Minnesota, is the quintessence of streamlined motel design: horizontal, one story, stretching all the way down its site to line up all its rooms in a row conveniently for cars, so it's a snap to park, check in, unload, unlock, change, brush, and sleep. For this is what a "motel" is: a MOtorist's hoTEL, one-stop off-the-road, into-bed convenience, no stairs to climb, no elevators to take.

Sunset's salutation

Photo by Gorup de Besanez, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
This Sunset Motel on Route 66 in Villa Ridge, Missouri, gives guests a double welcome: by its neon sign right on the road (a way virtually all motels lure roadsters in for the night) and by the open-armed layout of its building, which is accented with gables reminiscent of regional architecture, presenting itself as a place to call home, if only for a night.

Cactus comfort

Photos by Gorup de Besaanez, courtsy of Wikimedia Commons.

The Cactus Inn Motel in McLean, Texas, capitalizes big-time on the desert image of its south-to-southwest location in the U.S. (as well as its own hot, dry area) to hook in guests. 

Given a cactus's association with a climate that's generally too arid and torrid to live in (it can go without water for a long time), as well as its painfully prickly feel to the touch, I'll never know how the cactus can be so appealing, unless its green color, as used on its sign, roof and room doors, is the lure. 

Or perhaps the image of the desert as unspoiled, open land that can be pioneered on, with the great natural beauty of sand, rocks and mountains, is a temptation. Besides, air conditioning and workable curtains and Venetian blinds are a given in a hotel, where you can enjoy your desert daydreams in the comforts of home.

Speaking of deserts...

Desert Sands' delight

Photo by John Phelan, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
A roadside sign is often catchier than a motel, as the way the owner hopes to hook the motorist off the road. This Albuquerque, New Mexico motel has a touch of Vegas in its signage, generating an image of the warm comfort of desert sands – though the shade from the balcony and roof and the AC you're virtually guaranteed in your room will make sure your sleep doesn't feel like a desert!

Straight as an arrow

Photo by Afiler from Seattle, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
Another attention-grabber sign, on a straight-as-an-arrow strip in Gallup, New Mexico, where two 'LODGE' motels vie for equal time. The more Vegas-y the strip, the more Vegas-y the sign must be, for roadside prominence (see my first image). That was what Venturi meant when he said, "Main Street is almost all right" – competing signage makes up a colorful strip.

Sleepy teepee
 
Photo by Raleigh Muns.
This Route 66 curiosity, Wigwam Motel No. 6 in Holbrook, Arizona, gives guests the illusion of cozying in a wigwam, luring them off the road with a familiar Indian folklore image from childhood. Since I had a backyard teepee tent as a kid, I'd tell Dad to stop here in an instant. Fake or not, at least these cabins are freestanding, which means no next-door noise.

Macie's Motel

This motel in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, pictured in the 1950s, typifies the "L" layout many motels were designed in, to allot as large a driveway/parking area as possible for a multitude of cars and maximum clearance for cars to get off the road. The freestanding cabins gave people a quieter option, so they wouldn't be subject to next-door noise, akin to what Susie Vargas (Janet Leigh) had to put up with from Uncle Joe Grandi's wild bebop/jazz party in the abutting room at the remote desert motel in Orson Welles' 1958 film Touch of Evil.

Speaking of Hollywood motels...

Bates' bane

This is fictitious, of course – a Universal Studios stage set – but it happens to be the notorious Bates Motel in Alfred Hitchcock's 1960 thriller Psycho, whose owner may have gotten some ideas from the sexually perverted motel night clerk in Touch of Evil, the late film critic Roger Ebert surmised.

If you happen to have seen Psycho, you know well what happens in this modest, lowly, innocent-looking motel complex, being watched over by the ominous Mansard-roofed mansion uphill, as a fitting symbol of the social exploitation and sexual voyeurism motels have been the subject of in movies, owing in part to their "nobody watching" isolation on the American landscape.

Lorraine's legacy

Photo by DavGreg, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
This former motel in Memphis, Tennessee, is now part of the National Civil Rights Museum, based on the real tragedy that took place here on April 4, 1968: the murder of civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who was staying at the Lorraine Motel, in Room 306, while he was planning protests centered around the Memphis sanitation strike that was taking place at the time. 

Photo by Bubba73, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
The building has been preserved as it was at the moment of King's assassination while he stood on the balcony, complete with a 1968 Cadillac an
d a 1959 Dodge that were parked below at the time, highlighting the importance of cars in a motel's design, as well as the frozen-in-time preservation of a memory of the event.

(The ring-buoy wreath marks the approximate spot where King was standing when he was shot.)

Vacancy

An abandoned motel in the desert along Route 66.
Sorry to wrap up on such a sour note, but it goes to show that motels should be checked out with caution. They tend to be so isolated, as places to go off a long, lonely road for a rest, that the comforts of home they offer do not make them safe havens to hide from what one never knows can happen there, from mayhem to murder to abandonment.

Thank you for visiting. I welcome your comments!


Sources:

"Abandoned Motel Stock Photos," iStock by Getty Images, https://www.istockphoto.com/photos/abandoned-motel

"Desert," National Geographic Society, https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/desert/

Ebert, Roger, "Reviews: Touch of Evil," RogerEbert.com, September 13, 1998, https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-touch-of-evil-1958

"Motel," Wikipedia, last edited on 10 September 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motel

"National Civil Rights Museum," Wikipedia, last edited on 21 October 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Civil_Rights_Museum

Sunday, October 25, 2026

Roman on the reservoir, Georgian on the green

The Walter J. Sullivan Water Purification Facility is the finest example of 21st-century Romanesque Revival architecture I've ever seen. Historical details and millennial water engineering work in concert to form a cutting-edge water purification plant in the cloak of Cantabrigian custom.
While on a winter walk around Fresh Pond in Cambridge, Mass., I was awestruck by so many aspects of this edifying edifice at once: its long reach across 155,632 square feet (about 3.6 acres); the attention to detail the architects, Barry Giorgi and Camp, Dresser & McKee (now CDM Smith), put into its Romanesque arches, window banks, and landmark lookout tower, in ways reminiscent of H.H. Richardson and early Frank Lloyd Wright; its historically compatible choice of building materials; and its monumental majesty on the reservoir as a tribute to the city's age-old tradition of keeping Fresh Pond fresh. 

Keith N. Morgan of the Society of Architectural Historians put it best: "
Ten years in planning, this facility reconceptualized waterworks as community center. Camp, Dresser and McKee—a global corporation begun in 1947 as a partnership of MIT sanitation engineers Thomas Camp, Herman Dresser, and Jack McKee—undertook the project from design through construction. Site studies led to demolition and replacement of the former facilities, a Neo-Georgian 1915 structure by George A. Johnson and a 1922 pump house. Recognizing Fresh Pond as a recreational asset, architect Barry Giorgi's design welcomes the public with Romanesque Revival styling and multiple materials (cast stone, granite, brick, and slate). It displays the awesome water process systems through large arched windows."

The 1915 Neo-Georgian structure by George A. Johnson that
the 
Walter J. Sullivan Water Purification Facility replaced. 

A facility of this archi-technological caliber made me optimistic that the new millennium would revive the historical styles we had spurned over a half-century, until Post-Modernism signaled a new nostalgia for them, coming full circle with a fuller revival of them to revive the classic civic pride with which we had once bestowed our buildings, while casting the classics in the contemporary context of 21st-century technological advancement.

A parallel structure enunciating comparable optimism was Robert A.M. Stern's Spangler Center at Harvard Business School, built the same year (2001) in a Georgian Revival that similarly spread its walls and wings far across campus to encompass 29 project rooms, a 350-seat auditorium, IT support services, and much more in old-school brick, arches, keystones, quoins, cornices, columns and porticoes.
Upon its completion, Witold Rybczynski wrote in Architect Magazine
that Spangler Center "resembles a large country house," while Boston Globe architecture critic Robert Campbell deemed it "the best piece of traditional architecture to be built in Greater Boston since the early decades of the twentieth century."




These edifices marked another revival for the first time in a century, being some of the most ambitious paragons of the extension of rich historical architecture for blocks and blocks since the American Museum of Natural History in New York City.

This West Side castle hybrid of Gothic, Romanesque and Neoclassical comprises
 21 interconnected buildings housing 45 halls exhibiting 32 million specimens of plants, animals, fungi, fossils, minerals, rocks, meteorites, human remains, and human cultural artifacts over an urban extension of four street blocks and one avenue block, while being surrounded by its own parkland (Theodore Roosevelt Park) to give it the open space it needs for architectural self- expression. The museum was built from 1871 to 2023 from designs by multiple architects, most notably Calvert Vaux and J. Wrey Mould (the original Gothic castle), J. Cleaveland Cady (the neo-Romanesque wings along West 77th Street), Candy, Berg & See (the Romanesque Revival granite façades), John Russell Pope (the neoclassical Central Park West entrance façade with the mighty columns, and the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Hall Rotunda), Jeanne Gang and Davis Brody Bond (the 2023 Richard Gilder Center for Science, Education, and Innovation), and Gary Hilderbrand of Reed Hilderbrand, as the landscape architect for the rejuvenation of Theodore Roosevelt Park.

The sheer magnitude of this museum filled me with all the awe of an awestruck admirer when I was a kid. I especially couldn't fathom how its front castle of conical turrets and lancet finials could extend all the way from W. 81st Street to W. 77th Street.

Especially awesome is the moment you pass through Pope's monumental columned entry into a barrel-vaulted ceiling of octagonal coffers, a Diocletian transom, and polished marble columns with leafy capitals, which make up a majestic showcase space for a suspended fossil display, as a high-style tribute to Teddy Roosevelt as a naturalist and conservationist.

The museum's vast, never-ending halls, replete with natural, sculptural, dioramic, fossil and crystal exhibits, were even more indescribable in a child's mind, best expressed by Holden Caulfield in J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye:

Then you'd pass by this long, long Indian war canoe, about as long as three goddam Cadillacs in a row, with about twenty Indians in it, some of them paddling, some of them just standing around looking tough, and they all had war paint all over their faces. There was one very spooky guy in the back of the canoe, with a mask on. He was the witch doctor. He gave me the creeps, but I liked him anyway...

The Whitney Hall of Oceanic Birds at its official
dedication in 1953. AMNH Photograph #319645.
Boy, that museum was full of glass cases. There were even more upstairs, with deer inside them drinking at water holes, and birds flying south for the winter. The birds nearest you were all stuffed and hung up on wires, and the ones in back were just painted on the wall, but they all looked like they were really flying south, and if you bent your head down and sort of looked at them upside down, they looked in an even bigger hurry to fly south. 
The best thing, though, in that museum was that everything always stayed right where it was. Nobody'd move. You could go there a hundred thousand times, and that Eskimo would still be just finished catching those two fish, the birds would still be on their way south, the deers would still be drinking out of that water hole, with their pretty antlers and their pretty, skinny legs, and that squaw with the naked bosom would still be weaving that same blanket. Nobody'd be different. The only thing that would be different would be you.


But I digress... I was just as overjoyed as a child would be the year the Walter J. Sullivan Water Purification Facility and the Spangler Center were dedicated as upright monuments to water conservation and higher education, that people were building big and beautiful again, in the grand old-hat but high-hat tradition of the American Museum of Natural History, as opposed to those mammoth modern megablocks they'd been ripping down historic districts for from the fifties forward. 
But, alas, the full-scale Romanesque and Georgian revivals spearheaded by Sullivan and Spangler were short-lived, giving way once again to unmemorable modernist mediocrity by the time a quarter of the new century had lapsed. So let's enjoy these big, beautiful bonanzas while they're still with us, because their kind will never be built again (unless, of course, you're a Mar-a-Lago mogul in the White House with a ballroom on the brain, which I don't look forward to).

Thank you for visiting. I welcome your comments!


Sources:

"American Museum of Natural History," Wikipedia, last edited on 20 October 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Museum_of_Natural_History

"American Museum of Natural History – Exterior and Interior," Historic Districts Council, https://hdc.org/buildings/american-museum-of-natural-history/

"Cambridge Municipal Facilities Energy Use Disclosure Report," Calendar Year 2015, https://www.cambridgema.gov/cdd/news/2014/07/~/~/media/3db131e0716f4e7ab215d8070ff503ed.ash

"Classics, Old and New," Harvard Magazine, March 1, 2001, https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2001/03/classics-old-and-new-html

Morgan, Keith N., "Cambridge Water Purification Facility," Society of Architectural Historians Archipedia, 2001, https://sah-archipedia.org/buildings/MA-01-NC3

Rybczynski, Witold, "Tata Hall and the Art of Adding to the Harvard Business School Campus," Architect, October 14, 2014, https://www.architectmagazine.com/design/buildings/witold-rybczynski-tata-hall-and-the-art-of-adding-to-the-harvard-business-school-campus_o/

Salinger, J.D., The Catcher in the Rye, New York and Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1951, 1979, 1991 and 2014, pp. 134-135.

"Spangler Center," Wikipedia, last edited on 28 May 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spangler_Center